Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Index unused with OR?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Herouth Maoz
Тема Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Index unused with OR?
Дата
Msg-id l03110703b18474572af0@[147.233.159.109]
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Index unused with OR?  ("Olaf Mittelstaedt" <mstaedt@va-sigi.va.fh-ulm.de>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
At 17:59 +0300 on 14/5/98, Olaf Mittelstaedt wrote:


>
> w=> vacuum;
> VACUUM
> w=> explain select * from p where m = 29000;
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan on p  (cost=0.00 size=0 width=10)

Unrelated to the question in hand - you complained about VACUUM not
properly updating the stats. It seems to me you should use VACUUM ANALYZE
for that to happen. Just vacuuming means elimination of old rows no longer
used.

Herouth



В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Byron Nikolaidis
Дата:
Сообщение: NEW ODBC DRIVER v.0241
Следующее
От: Herouth Maoz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [INTERFACES] binary insert with JDBC